What follows is the homily I preached this past Lord's Day, the III Sunday of Paschaltide, at Corpus Christi and St Theresa's Parishes.
"My brothers, one can confidently say to you about the Patriarch David that he died and was buried, and his tomb is in our midst to this day." This is St Peter speaking here, and he is making a comparison to the burial of Jesus. "God raised Jesus; of this we are all witnesses!"
"My brothers, one can confidently say to you about the Patriarch David that he died and was buried, and his tomb is in our midst to this day." This is St Peter speaking here, and he is making a comparison to the burial of Jesus. "God raised Jesus; of this we are all witnesses!"
Really, now? I’ll bet there are fair few of you who might
be a bit sceptical. Jesus survived His own death? He
came back to life? And we know this? It’s a fair question. Actually, no:
It’s the question. Because if Christ was not resurrected, you
and I are wasting our time with this Christianity business and we are suckers
for history’s greatest hoax.
This morning I’d like to present you with
the Top Ten Evidences That Jesus Was Raised From The Dead. Here we go.
1. The tomb of Jesus, which exists to this day,
remains empty. In Jerusalem, the Church of the Holy
Sepulchre houses the original gravesite of Jesus Christ, but His body isn’t there. I invite those who may be interested to read
a groundbreaking article by the Biblical archaeologist Fr Jerome
Murphy-O’Connor, The Argument for the Holy Sepulchre, available online.
2. No other tomb claims to have
the body of Jesus. The founders of
the world’s religions all have identifiable tombs: Mohammed, Siddhartha, Confucius, and so on. Only Jesus’ tomb is both identifiable and empty. What’s even more, Jesus’ opponents were
partially convinced that the His empty tomb was a hoax, but have never been
able to blow the whistle, so to speak, by producing His corpse.
3. The Easter-event was
experienced by those indisposed to
believe in any kind of resurrections.
In first-century Judaism, belief in the resurrection was only an obscure
theory held by Pharisees, a lay movement within Judaism. The Sadducees, who were the religious
aristocracy tended to be somewhat rationalist on matters pertaining to the
hereafter. Ordinary folk, let alone fishermen-become-Apostles,
when they listened to Jesus predicting His own Resurrection, it went right over
their heads. Being thus indisposed to believe in resurrections,
it is highly, highly unlikely that they would have invented an Easter
faerie-tale because it would have been too foreign to their way of thinking.
4. The Easter-event was proclaimed by those who
experienced, it at great cost. Almost
nobody would believe in their own hoax and die for it, too. But to those who witnessed the Risen Christ,
the experience was so real and so palpable that they were willing to surrender
their lives for it. St Peter was
crucified upside-down. St Thomas was speared,
branded, then burned. St Bartholomew was
skinned alive. All of the Apostles—the
Twelve and others—except one, were martyred.
St John was exiled to the isle of Patmos for his testimony. If the Easter-event were a fabrication, you’d
have a heck of a time trying to explain why the Apostles believed it to the
point of gruesome execution.
5. None of the original
followers of Jesus provided an alternative to the Easter-event. We know that the Apostles did not always get
along. Yet they were consistent in their
proclamation that Jesus resurrected.
Moreover—and listen to me carefully—if the Easter-event were a hoax, we
would have to account for the fact that nobody, but nobody blew the whistle.
There is no early Christian leader, or sect for that matter, who said
“Hold on, wait a minute. The Easter
story is a fake. I’ll tell you where
Jesus’ body is. I’ll tell you what really happened.” No-one, whether Jesus’ opponents or former
followers, have been able to uncover any sort of ‘Easter conspiracy’—because
there is none.
6. Nor were the original
opponents of Jesus able to uncover the Easter-event as a fabrication. A very curious absence in the historiography
of our ‘elder bothers’—the Jewish people—is that very little is said beyond the
fact that Jesus was crucified. We
possess nothing from the Sanhedrin—who condemned Jesus and who opposed the
preaching of the Apostles—trying to falsify the Easter-event. The absence of any alternative explanation
whatsoever to the Easter-event speaks strongly for the truth that Jesus was
resurrected.
7. The precise moment of the Resurrection was never
recorded or described. Another
curious thing—if the Easter-event were a fabrication, then there would have
been at least one storyteller describing, with grandiose imagery, what the
Resurrection looked like: How someone
saw a blinding flash of light, the tomb-stone being rolled, and Jesus actually
emerging gloriously from the tomb. The
absence of a predictable element in any false alibi—someone seeing someone
somewhere and doing something—lends credibility to the Easter narrative. If the Easter-event were a fabrication, there
would have been at least one lying eyewitness, even more than one for the sake
of corroborating testimony, but there isn’t.
8. The first witnesses to the
Resurrection were women. In Semitic jurisprudence, the testimony
of women was inadmissible in court, let alone in culture enough to give a
witness that triggered the rapid expansion of Christianity. As one of the ‘Holy Myrrhbearing Women,’ St
Mary Magdalene has the distinction of having the title of ‘Apostle to the
Apostles’—and this woman, whose word
shouldn’t count, had audacity enough to tell a bunch of coarse men that she met
the Risen Christ. The boldness of second-class
people being the first to proclaim the Good News speaks to the truth of Jesus’
Resurrection.
9. St Paul ‘calls his own bluff’
on the veracity of Christ’s Resurrection.
He was ardently opposed to Christianity and was personally responsible
for arresting and summarily executing Christians. But on the way to Damascus to continue his
genocide of Christians, St Paul met the risen Jesus and his life was changed. He even goes so far as to say, “if Christ has
not been raised, then our proclamation has been in vain and your faith has been
in vain. …If Christ has not been raised,
your faith is futile. …If for this life
only we have hoped in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied.” But, he says, “in fact Christ has been raised
from the dead.” And what did he get out
of all this? A meagre income as a
tentmaker, dangerous mission trips, and finally a beheading at Rome, but all
for the simple truth that Christ is risen.
10. Only an historically
supernatural event can account for the rapid expansion of Christianity. That is pretty self-explanatory: The very basis of Christianity’s validity
lies in the first Easter, nothing else.
My friends: That is what makes us Christians; we believe
that Jesus Christ was victorious over His own Death. As
Consuela the house maid from Family Guy would
say, “No…no…Mr Jesus no es
here.” Not only was Jesus rasied—past
tense—but he is risen—present tense. It
is the quintessential, defining ‘thing’ of Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please ensure that comments are concise, to the point, and substantiated. All laws of English grammar remain in force. Thanks!